Data analysis and scientific reasoning for self-evaluation and revision
Curriculum Component Patterns
Description:
Students identify causal and correlational relationships of different groups of data sets collected from the experiment and write down their statements using the process of scientific reasoning (CER). Please remember to ask students to conduct peer-assessment with the given success criteria in the previous step.
Typical sequence of tasks in this CC pattern:
1. Students identify causal and correlational relationship of different groups of data sets.
2. Students choose valid and reliable evidences that support the claims
3. Students apply scientific principles/theories to construct an explanation for the results.
4. Students write down their statements on the process of scientific reasoning
5. Conduct self-assessment on the scientific reasoning process (claim, evidence, reasoning)
6. Students improve the process of scientific reasoning
7. Students construct graphical displays to illustrate the relationships of the variables, and present to the whole class.
Related patterns at the same level
Related products
-
Curriculum Component Patterns
Theory-practice analysis
-
Curriculum Component Patterns
Self-monitoring through prototype construction
-
Curriculum Component Patterns
Self-evaluation through competition
-
Curriculum Component Patterns
Designing and reviewing resources
-
Curriculum Component Patterns
Client interview for goal-setting
Patterns at other levels
You may also like…
-
Reflective Learning
Well-designed criteria for evaluating self/peer performance
-
Course Level Patterns Constructed by Integrating the Pedagogical Approach Pattern to the Selected Disciplinary Practice
Scientific Investigation and Self-Directed Learning
-
Curriculum Component Patterns
Revision of the experimental design to improve/extend the findings
-
Construction: Conceptual / Visual Artefacts
Academic writing
-
Presentations, Performance Illustrations
Synchronous presentation for sharing deliverables from productive learning tasks
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.