Well-designed criteria for evaluating self/peer performance
Task Patterns
Description:
Well-designed criteria allow student comparison of lesson objectives to what is assessed..
Implementation notes
1. Assign breakout group discussion for self-/peer-assessment with clear instruction, i.e., worksheet, rubric, or guiding questions, for students to define good performance.
2. Encourage students to utilize a self-developed rubric to evaluate their own or a peer’s work and share what kinds of feedback they find most valuable.
Related patterns at the same level
Related products
-
Directed learningVideo watching for obtaining information
-
Directed learning
Video watching for identifying problems
-
Explorations through ConversationSynchronous discussion
-
Presentations, Performance IllustrationsAsynchronous presentation for sharing deliverables from productive learning tasks
-
Construction: Conceptual / Visual ArtefactsAcademic writing
Patterns at other levels
You may also like…
-
Curriculum Component PatternsConstruct a solution through a mission-focused inquiry learning (MFIL) cycle
-
Curriculum Component PatternsClient interview for goal-setting
-
Curriculum Component PatternsSelf-planning through ideate design plans
-
Curriculum Component PatternsData analysis and scientific reasoning for self-evaluation and revision
-
Curriculum Component PatternsConducting experiments for self-monitoring
-
Curriculum Component PatternsSelf-evaluation through competition
-
Curriculum Component PatternsTheory-practice analysis
-
Curriculum Component PatternsIdeate design plans for goal-setting
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.